YaBB Administrator wrote on 12/09/12 at 16:03:20:I'm really trying to move away from the way the tuning method the Optimiser uses. It takes too much attention off the road.
It scares me to think of all the mileage I did negotiating winding roads without even watching the road. I don't know how I did it.
The best approach is to set up logging and then forget it's there. You can then tune after the ride.
I'm not a fan of the multiple map theory. The portions of the map used for cruising are quite localised and distinct from those used for more spirited riding. It should be possible to tune one area for economy and another for power.
I agree - using Hardware Optimiser is a dangerous business except on a runway.
Processing collected data afterwards using a settable threshold with a good known default to filter out data of those suggestions which have not occurred often enough to be significant were a useful feature.
A single map is of course the preference.
Imagination needed to understand the two dimensional array to find out the cruising area is quite a hard test to a newbie - if he/she is not a hard core injection hobbyist already.
Revs are easy to understand but how open is the throttle at the same time?
Cali.ecu map does not help a lot as it uses a single target.
I found Sport.ecu as a good starting point as its targets O3-O6 are very sensible for me because I am not putting together a racer.
Volts/AFR are 2.40/14.6, 2.25/14.1, 2.00/13.4, 1.75/12.6
Cali and Sport maps have different rev break points but in spite of that I copied the flags part of the sport.ecu map to my cali map.
If anyone has improvement suggestions they are welcome.