Hello Carl,
This is my guess on what Mike might have meant. I copied an example of the ignition map above from
http://www.jefferies-au.org/MyECU/index.htm -> Maps
The map values are only for example but show the structure of the map, which I am sure you are already familiar with.
I suppose that dual plugs will make the combustion "faster" and thus less ignition advance is needed.
I think Mike means that you should reduce the advance by 5 degrees at full throttle (100 %) => take the top row of the ignition map and substract value 5 from each of those values (for each column). As the maximum advance in this example map was 35 degrees, the new max value would be 30 degrees. It seems that Mike suggests not to go above 26 degrees anywhere in the map.
The middle row (50 %) => substract 2 degrees.
The bottom row (idle) => no substraction, original values ok.
As you see, you need to interpolate suitable substraction for each of the rows separately based on Mike's values which were only given for certain throttle openings.
Hopefully this helps. No guarantee that this is correct, but feels reasonable though !
br, JuhaV
PS. A long time ago, 2005, I had Mike's valves in my Sport Corsa 1100i. Porting was DIY due to the loooong distance between Finland and US.
http://www.kolumbus.fi/koivupiha/hw2005/behind.JPG (see the Optimiser on the triple tree !)
http://www.kolumbus.fi/koivupiha/hw2005/in_valves.jpghttp://www.kolumbus.fi/koivupiha/hw2005/ex_valves.jpghttp://www.kolumbus.fi/koivupiha/hw2005/chamber_ported.jpg